Do not let the backlog become a graveyard
An infinite issue list is not a priority. Ontra’s sprint lock and milestones say which card lives this week. The rest waits in line; it is not deleted. Do not open a task without a feature. An unbound task blinds the roadmap. At quarter-end you ask “which package did this belong to?” An empty feature is a warning: the percent is a manager’s hope, not card count.
If the decision stays in a GitHub comment, next quarter forgets it. Write the short decision on the Ontra task comment. The doc carries acceptance criteria, not the issue title. The pull request number sits on the task field. Review chat may stay on GitHub; the acceptance sentence lands in Ontra. Next quarter does not hunt a PR to learn why you did it this way. Milestone dates come from the plan, not the code.
- Do not open a task without a feature
- Do not leave the decision in a GitHub comment
- Tech debt is tagged, not a secret list
- Milestones come from the plan, not the code
- The PR number sits on the task field
Internal review and client approval are separate columns
In a software vocabulary do not let “review” mean two things. Internal review is code. Client approval is product. If you keep both in the same green, the sprint lies. QA can be its own status. Only live counts as done. Close speed reads that mark. A custom status does not break the report. The CI key is narrow; the pipeline does not delete tasks or invite members.
Tech debt should not be a secret list
Debt is tagged, not stored in a separate graveyard. If it cannot find a seat in the sprint, it stays visible. A secret “we’ll look later” list explodes at quarter-end. If the goal sentence is “halve reopened work,” the repeat report feeds it. A separate quality tool splits the record again. Acceptance criteria live on the doc; that is where the “done” lie dies.
The slide is generated from the plan
If the exec deck updates Friday night and the board moves Monday, two truths are born. The milestone report opens five minutes before the meeting. There is no separate “management truth.” Use cases keep the customer’s language. Features do not drift into engineering slang. Four layers are enough: module, use case, feature, milestone. A fifth layer starts the novel.
Closing the issue-wiki-slide trio
An infinite issue list is not a priority. Sprint lock and milestones say which card lives this week. The rest waits in line. A task without a feature blinds the tree. An empty feature turns percent into hope. If the decision stays in a GitHub comment, next quarter forgets it. The acceptance sentence lands on the card. The PR number sits on the task field. Review chat may stay on GitHub. The doc carries acceptance criteria, not the issue title.
Internal review and client approval are separate columns. QA can be its own. Only live counts as done. The CI key is narrow; the pipeline does not delete tasks or invite members. Tech debt is tagged, not a secret graveyard. If it cannot find a sprint seat it stays visible. If the goal is “halve reopened work,” the repeat report feeds it. A separate quality tool splits the record again.
The milestone report kills the Friday-slide / Monday-board twin truth. Use cases keep the customer’s language. Features do not drift into engineering jargon. Four layers are enough. A fifth starts the novel. The backlog is not a graveyard; it is the line in front of a locked sprint. The roadmap leaves the slide and lives on the tree.
Code, card, and slide on one tree
An infinite issue list is not a priority. Lock and milestones say which card lives this week. A task without a feature blinds. An empty feature turns percent into hope. If the decision stays on GitHub it is forgotten. Acceptance lands on the card. The PR number sits on the field. Review chat may stay on GitHub. The doc carries acceptance not the issue title. Internal review and client approval are separate columns. QA can be its own. Only live counts as done. The CI key is narrow. Tech debt is tagged not a secret graveyard. If the goal is repeats halved the repeat report feeds it. A separate quality tool splits.
The milestone report kills the Friday-slide Monday-board twin. Use case is customer language. Features do not drift into jargon. Four layers are enough. The backlog is not a graveyard it is the line in front of a locked sprint. The roadmap leaves the slide and lives on the tree.
A team that does not bind the PR to the card hunts next quarter for why we did it this way. A team that binds reads the sentence in the comment. This ten-second write kills a three-month search.
Three rules in the first sprint: no task without a feature, no done without acceptance bullets, PR number not left empty. All three are boring. What is boring is carrying the roadmap on a slide.
Bind the PR to the card
The pull request number sits on the task field. Review chat may stay on GitHub; the acceptance sentence lands in Ontra. Next quarter does not hunt a PR to learn why you did it this way.
More posts
Product
When tasks and docs share one record, work stops scattering
List, board, and roadmap are views of the same record. A decision is made once and every surface shows the same truth. This piece explains how a pile of tools delays delivery and how Ontra binds one record.
Security
Fine-grained access lets the team breathe
Not everyone needs every project. Add project, folder, and list access on top of roles, and privacy becomes the default. In agencies and holdings the leak is rarely malice — it is the oversized shortcut “admins see everything.”
Setup
Finish the workspace in the 7-day demo, not the tool tour
No credit card. When the demo ends the app locks and data stays. Load real work in week one instead of touring screens: a project, roles, the live sprint, the docs tree, and the first report. A showroom tour does not pick a tool; a sitting record does.
